If you search for it on github, I wrote a simple program that lets you use a pass phrase to decrypt an encrypted file and put its contents in the clipboard (for X11 systems though). The rest of the commands can be looked up in the docs "whenever", as needed. You really only need to memorize and master a few git commands: Then use 'git commit' followed by 'git push' to your dev branch, and then do the pull request. Therefore you should just do all of your merges and any additional edits using a decent local merge tool (maybe 'meld'?) between your local working copy and the dev branch on github, after you do a 'git pull' on your local copy of the dev branch so you know that what you're comparing to for your merge is at least CLOSE to what you'll be doing the pull request for (assuming that no major edits in the official branch affect the pull request). submitting your dev branch's differences from the official repo) the github inteface works very well. When I read that part, I knew EXACTLY why Linus would say this. example follows.įrom the article: you should never ever use the github interfaces to merge anything (but that doesn't take the sting out of it the first time you sit down to use it.) However, the choice of nomenclature does begin to make more sense the more you become steeped in git. So there is learning involved (the choice of nomenclature just makes things that much more uncomfortable). (there are some of those floating around though) To the git project's credit there are very good tutorials to help you make friends with it, but the downside is they are some 30 page tutorials that are not geared to answer "the top 10 things you normally need to know to use git". The git command line is its own little language. The git nomenclature does suck! Not that it is bad, but that it is completely non-intuitive for someone who may otherwise be very skilled and fluent in a number of other projects that are now hosted on Github. You wouldn't sit down to write something in C having only a passing knowledge of the language, or you wouldn't write a Bind config or zone file without significant effort to learn the lingo of the Berkeley DNS named server. The CLI for git is a fantastic tool, but just like any advanced piece of software, you have to make friends with it first. $ cat /mnt/x/storagenode3/storagenode.log | grep 1wFTAgs9DP5RSnCqKV1eLf6N9wtk4EAtmN5DpSxcs8EjT69tGE | grep -E "GET_AUDIT" | jq -R '. Interestingly that node registers successful audits from them until disqualification. If the fallback triggers for some reason, you will see a failed audit in the log though, but it won’t count against your audit score. So in the scenario you describe there should already be 2 systems in place to prevent the node from being impacted. This was recently implemented to prevent issues when deleted or expired pieces are audited incorrectly. But even if that isn’t the case, if not enough nodes respond with the correct piece to recreate it (so less than 29 nodes respond with a correct piece) the audit failure won’t count against your score. So it should already stop auditing the same file. If a customer has deleted a piece the audit worker should already check metadata to see if the segment still exists and hasn’t expired. I thought you asked about when a node operator had deleted a piece by accident. I think I misread this last time I responded. What just came into my mind is if a node gets repeatedly audited for the same piece how would it be affected if the data gets deleted by customer?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |